EMERGENCE
Physicists and biologists talk about the 'emergence'
of properties, in complex physical systems, that are not
apparently connected with the underlying laws and
mechanisms governing these systems. The most dramatic
emergent property is LIFE. Other emergent phenomena that
are widely discussed include the emergence of spacetime
from some more fundamental theory like string theory, the emergence of
classical physics from quantum
mechanics, and the emergence of ordered structures in
otherwise chaotic systems. Some emergent phenomena depend
in an essential way on quantum mechanics (eg., superfluidity).
Before modern science it was widely believed that
things like life demanded non-physical explanations
(eg., a 'vital force', or some other supernatural or
superhuman cause). Now the pendulum has swung the other
way- most modern scientific explanations are
'reductionist', ie., they aim to explain everything in
terms of fundamental building blocks and the laws
governing their interactions. Thus, eg., life is
explained in terms of molecular building blocks and
complex structures formed by these, and the emergence
of classical physics from quantum physics is supposedly
explained by 'decoherence'.
However this 'lego block' approach to Nature has
certain problems. Scientists have to invent 'effective
theories' to explain emergent phenomena, and it is
sometimes impossible to connect these with the building
blocks. Moreover, Quantum
Mechanics itself seems to contain emergent
features, particularly those connected with
'entanglement'. The 'reductionism vs emergence' debate,
with highly publicised contributions opposing Anderson
vs Weinberg, may be the most important philosophical
dedate in science today.
|




|